Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: >> * ps/pseudo-ref-terminology (2024-05-10) 10 commits >> - refs: refuse to write pseudorefs >> - ref-filter: properly distinuish pseudo and root refs >> - refs: pseudorefs are no refs >> - refs: classify HEAD as a root ref >> - refs: root refs can be symbolic refs >> - refs: refname `is_special_ref()` to `is_pseudo_ref()` >> - refs: rename `is_pseudoref()` to `is_root_ref()` >> - Documentation/glossary: define root refs as refs >> - Documentation/glossary: clarify limitations of pseudorefs >> - Documentation/glossary: redefine pseudorefs as special refs >> >> Terminology to call various ref-like things are getting >> straightened out. >> >> Comments? >> source: <cover.1715330206.git.ps@xxxxxx> > > There have been a bunch of comments on these topics already, and overall > they have been positive. Is there something specific that you want to > see here? I did not get the feeling that we have given the series enough time to be seen and get commented on; indeed v4 has not got enough time to get any comments yet? Also you haven't responded either positively or negatively to comments on v3 07/10 by Peff?
