On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 12:54:12AM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > > > On March 30, 2024 7:06:51 p.m. GMT+01:00, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> wrote: > >On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 11:59:51AM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > >> On 30-03-2024 10:06, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > >> > On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 09:20:22AM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > >> > > On 30-03-2024 09:18, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > >> > > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 09:14:47AM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > >> > > > > On 22-03-2024 14:04, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > >> > > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 11:08:34AM +0100, Christian Couder wrote: > >> > > > > > > (Sorry for initially sending this privately to Patrick.) > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 10:41 AM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > > > > [snip] > >> > > > > > > > I'd personally rather go with the latter, mostly because it matches our > >> > > > > > > > git-scm.com domain. I also like it better than the current git-vcs/git > >> > > > > > > > because of that. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > So Chris, would you mind adding me (@pks-t, my non-GitLab handle) as an > >> > > > > > > > additional owner of that group? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I'll empty out my gitscm group, make it private so that it won't be > >> > > > > accidentally used and transfer ownership to pks-t. You can then 'do what is > >> > > > > needed' with the group. Since gitlab doesn't support aliases (yet? :p) best > >> > > > > to park the namespace. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Olliver > >> > > > > >> > > > By the way, thanks a ton for being this open and helpful during the > >> > > > whole process. This is greatly appreciated! > >> > > > >> > > Hey, no problem. I initiated this discussion because I wanted to get to this > >> > > solution. Just because my mirror is not used doesn't mean I don't agree :) > >> > > > >> > > Btw, I can't transfer the group, it's empty, but if I delete it _right now_, > >> > > you'll have to re-create it, _right_now_ (well within the next 5 minutes?). > >> > > >> > Shouldn't it be possible to add me as a secondary owner of the group in > >> > [1]? From thereon I could "transfer" the group by removing you from it. > >> > >> Done and done. > >> > >> I'll remove myself, or you can kick me :( one I know you have successfully > >> received ownership. I tried to invite the group git-scm but that couldn't be > >> found, probably you can do that (and then remove yourself :p) > >> > >> Would have been useful to transfer ownership of a group, iirc you do that > >> with repo's as well? Under the hood it could use the invite + remove members > >> thing. Though this works. > > > >Thanks! I've added Christian to this group such that it has a higher bus > >factor. I guess it should probably have the same owners as the "git-scm" > >one just in case we ever want to do anything with it. I've also removed > > Could you not just invite the git-scm group and have no members at all? In theory yes. In practice though this could cause us to hit the free user limit in the "gitscm" group eventually. This could be fine given that we don't intend to use the group anyway. But I wasn't a 100% sure and wanted to double check first before doing that. Patrick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
