On 30-03-2024 10:06, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 09:20:22AM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
On 30-03-2024 09:18, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 09:14:47AM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
On 22-03-2024 14:04, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 11:08:34AM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
(Sorry for initially sending this privately to Patrick.)
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 10:41 AM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
I'd personally rather go with the latter, mostly because it matches our
git-scm.com domain. I also like it better than the current git-vcs/git
because of that.
So Chris, would you mind adding me (@pks-t, my non-GitLab handle) as an
additional owner of that group?
I'll empty out my gitscm group, make it private so that it won't be
accidentally used and transfer ownership to pks-t. You can then 'do what is
needed' with the group. Since gitlab doesn't support aliases (yet? :p) best
to park the namespace.
Olliver
By the way, thanks a ton for being this open and helpful during the
whole process. This is greatly appreciated!
Hey, no problem. I initiated this discussion because I wanted to get to this
solution. Just because my mirror is not used doesn't mean I don't agree :)
Btw, I can't transfer the group, it's empty, but if I delete it _right now_,
you'll have to re-create it, _right_now_ (well within the next 5 minutes?).
Shouldn't it be possible to add me as a secondary owner of the group in
[1]? From thereon I could "transfer" the group by removing you from it.
Done and done.
I'll remove myself, or you can kick me :( one I know you have
successfully received ownership. I tried to invite the group git-scm but
that couldn't be found, probably you can do that (and then remove
yourself :p)
Would have been useful to transfer ownership of a group, iirc you do
that with repo's as well? Under the hood it could use the invite +
remove members thing. Though this works.
Patrick
[1]: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitscm/-/group_members
