On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 09:20:22AM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > On 30-03-2024 09:18, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 09:14:47AM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote: > > > On 22-03-2024 14:04, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 11:08:34AM +0100, Christian Couder wrote: > > > > > (Sorry for initially sending this privately to Patrick.) > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 10:41 AM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > > I'd personally rather go with the latter, mostly because it matches our > > > > > > git-scm.com domain. I also like it better than the current git-vcs/git > > > > > > because of that. > > > > > > > > > > > > So Chris, would you mind adding me (@pks-t, my non-GitLab handle) as an > > > > > > additional owner of that group? > > > > > > I'll empty out my gitscm group, make it private so that it won't be > > > accidentally used and transfer ownership to pks-t. You can then 'do what is > > > needed' with the group. Since gitlab doesn't support aliases (yet? :p) best > > > to park the namespace. > > > > > > Olliver > > > > By the way, thanks a ton for being this open and helpful during the > > whole process. This is greatly appreciated! > > Hey, no problem. I initiated this discussion because I wanted to get to this > solution. Just because my mirror is not used doesn't mean I don't agree :) > > Btw, I can't transfer the group, it's empty, but if I delete it _right now_, > you'll have to re-create it, _right_now_ (well within the next 5 minutes?). Shouldn't it be possible to add me as a secondary owner of the group in [1]? From thereon I could "transfer" the group by removing you from it. Patrick [1]: https://gitlab.com/groups/gitscm/-/group_members
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
