Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] repack: refactor pack snapshot-ing logic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Here is a small reroll of my series to clean up some of the internals of
> 'git repack' used to track the set of existing packs.
>
> Much is unchanged from the last round, save for some additional clean-up
> on how we handle the '->util' field for each pack's string_list_item in
> response to very helpful review from those CC'd.

The change to [7/8] was as expected and looking good.  Let's see if
we see additional reviews from others, plan to declare victory and
merge it to 'next' by early next week at the latest, if not sooner.

Christian, your cc/repack-sift-filtered-objects-to-separate-pack
topic will have to interact with this topic when merged to 'seen',
so it would be good for you to give a review on these patches (if
only to understand the new world order) and optionally make a trial
merge between the two to see how well they work together and what
adjustment will be needed when you eventually rebase your topic on
top.  Actual rebasing can wait until this topic graduates, but trial
merge is something you can immediately do in the meantime to prepare
for the future.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux