On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 12:44:04PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Here is a small reroll of my series to clean up some of the internals of > > 'git repack' used to track the set of existing packs. > > > > Much is unchanged from the last round, save for some additional clean-up > > on how we handle the '->util' field for each pack's string_list_item in > > response to very helpful review from those CC'd. > > The change to [7/8] was as expected and looking good. Let's see if > we see additional reviews from others, plan to declare victory and > merge it to 'next' by early next week at the latest, if not sooner. This looks great to me. The motivation in the revised patch 7 is much easier to follow, and the end result is much nicer to read. :) -Peff