On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 9:44 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Here is a small reroll of my series to clean up some of the internals of > > 'git repack' used to track the set of existing packs. > > > > Much is unchanged from the last round, save for some additional clean-up > > on how we handle the '->util' field for each pack's string_list_item in > > response to very helpful review from those CC'd. > > The change to [7/8] was as expected and looking good. Let's see if > we see additional reviews from others, plan to declare victory and > merge it to 'next' by early next week at the latest, if not sooner. > > Christian, your cc/repack-sift-filtered-objects-to-separate-pack > topic will have to interact with this topic when merged to 'seen', > so it would be good for you to give a review on these patches (if > only to understand the new world order) and optionally make a trial > merge between the two to see how well they work together and what > adjustment will be needed when you eventually rebase your topic on > top. Actual rebasing can wait until this topic graduates, but trial > merge is something you can immediately do in the meantime to prepare > for the future. Ok, I will try to review and merge this with cc/repack-sift-filtered-objects-to-separate-pack soon.
