Victoria Dye <vdye@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Shuqi Liang wrote: >> change against v4: > > I've reviewed the patches in this version and all of my prior feedback > appears to be addressed. Overall, I think this is ready to merge. > > I see that you didn't take the suggestion from [1], though. I personally > don't consider it a blocking issue, but I am curious to hear your > thoughts/reasoning behind sticking with your current patch organization over > what was suggested there. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/kl6la5v82izn.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Otherwise, a couple notes: Thanks for a review Victoria, and Shuqi, thanks for working on the topic. I too am curious what your response to [1] would be, by the way.
