On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:18:22PM +0000, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit schrieb:
> >On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 11:35:30AM +0000, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> >>Pierre Habouzit schrieb:
> >>>On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:53:36AM +0000, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> >>>>Pierre Habouzit schrieb:
> >>>>>+say_color () {
> >>>>>+ [ "$nocolor" = 0 ] && [ "$1" != '-1' ] && tput setaf "$1"
> >>>>>+ shift
> >>>>>+ echo "* $*"
> >>>>>+ tput op
> ^^^^^^^^
> I am talking about this line.
Oooh, good catch :P it should be guarded by a [ "$nocolor" = 0 ]
indeed :P (or use your solution).
> >>>>>+}
> >>I wanted to point out that if tput is not available, the second
> >>invocation will leave "tput: command not found" behind on stderr.
> >>Therefore, I proposed to make the definition of say_color() different
> >>depending on whether $color is set or not. Then you don't need to test
> >>for $color twice inside the function.
> > Right we can do that. I'll try to rework the patch. and no it
> >shouldn't leave tput: command not found as I 2>/dev/null and I think the
> >shell doesn't print that in that case. At least my zsh doesn't.
>
> There is no 2>/dev/null. Am I missing something?
I was.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx
OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpEjHqakstoQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
