Hi, On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote: > On 10/22/07, Andreas Ericsson <ae@xxxxxx> wrote: > [...] > >>>>> On 10/20/07, Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@xxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Maybe we could group commands into more categories? > > > Similarly, it might be helpful to have help topics the gdb way, like > > "git help patches". It's one of those things that people have come to > > expect from a software tool, so perhaps we should humor them? Given gits > > "every help topic is a man-page" idiom, this shouldn't require any real > > technical effort. > > > > Such topics should probably include > > merge/merges/merging - overview of various ways of putting two lines of > > development back together > > patch/patches - how to create, send and apply > > tags/branches/refs - what they are, why they're good, link to merging > > Very good idea. It is definitely something that can be worked on. > > By the way, what do you think about "spying" version of git, specially > marked release which gathers statistics of porcelain used, with > frequency of its use, and git-sendstats command added in this release? I like Wincent's approach, scanning .bash_history. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
