Jakub Narebski wrote:
On 10/22/07, Andreas Ericsson <ae@xxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
On 10/20/07, Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@xxxxxx> wrote:
Maybe we could group commands into more categories?
Similarly, it might be helpful to have help topics the gdb way, like
"git help patches". It's one of those things that people have come to
expect from a software tool, so perhaps we should humor them? Given gits
"every help topic is a man-page" idiom, this shouldn't require any real
technical effort.
Such topics should probably include
merge/merges/merging - overview of various ways of putting two lines of
development back together
patch/patches - how to create, send and apply
tags/branches/refs - what they are, why they're good, link to merging
Very good idea. It is definitely something that can be worked on.
By the way, what do you think about "spying" version of git, specially
marked release which gathers statistics of porcelain used, with
frequency of its use, and git-sendstats command added in this release?
I like it and I'd use it. What's more interesting is that I could
probably get my co-workers to do the same.
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
