On 23/05/01 02:51PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jacob Abel <jacobabel@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > [...] > > Once the thread is broken, it is broken. You gave a link in the > message I am responding to, to make it easier for people to go back > to earlier iterations and that is good enough, I think. Understood. > > Your eventual v10 can be sent with its cover set as a reply to the > cover of v9 and we will be fine. > > It seems that we may need another iteration, but if I reclal > correctly what remains are all minor issues? > > Thanks. Based on the feedback so far yes. However I have yet to get any reviews on patches 5/8 through 8/8 for this revision so it's unclear to me if they were fine/didn't require any changes or if they just weren't reviewed yet? Also I have yet to hear anything back about whether to keep patches 7/8 and 8/8 in this patchset or break them out into their own followup patchset (original note about this was in the cover letter [1]). 1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/20230417093255.31079-1-jacobabel@xxxxxxxxxx/
