Jacob Abel <jacobabel@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I've noticed on the lore that this revision didn't continue the existing > thread[1] for the patchset. It seems this is because the `In-Reply-To` > header was stripped from the message due to a bug with the MTA/mail bridge > I use on my dev machine [2]. > > Apologies for any confusion this may have caused. > > For continuity purposes I can either: > > A. RESEND the revision to the main thread with a note in the cover letter > tagging the discussions from this thread so far. > > B. Reply to [1] in the main thread to point to this thread and then > eventually publish v10 in reply to that reply message in the main thread. > > C. Reply to [1] in the main thread to point to this thread and then > eventually publish v10 in reply to this cover letter. > > Let me know which would be the least disruptive/most ideal way forward or > if there is another way I should approach this. > > Thanks. > > 1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/20230109173227.29264-1-jacobabel@xxxxxxxxxx/ > 2. https://github.com/ProtonMail/proton-bridge/issues/374 Once the thread is broken, it is broken. You gave a link in the message I am responding to, to make it easier for people to go back to earlier iterations and that is good enough, I think. Your eventual v10 can be sent with its cover set as a reply to the cover of v9 and we will be fine. It seems that we may need another iteration, but if I reclal correctly what remains are all minor issues? Thanks.
