Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] worktree: Support `--orphan` when creating new worktrees

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23/04/17 09:33AM, Jacob Abel wrote:
>
> [...]

I've noticed on the lore that this revision didn't continue the existing
thread[1] for the patchset. It seems this is because the `In-Reply-To`
header was stripped from the message due to a bug with the MTA/mail bridge
I use on my dev machine [2].

Apologies for any confusion this may have caused.

For continuity purposes I can either:

A. RESEND the revision to the main thread with a note in the cover letter
tagging the discussions from this thread so far.

B. Reply to [1] in the main thread to point to this thread and then
eventually publish v10 in reply to that reply message in the main thread.

C. Reply to [1] in the main thread to point to this thread and then
eventually publish v10 in reply to this cover letter.

Let me know which would be the least disruptive/most ideal way forward or
if there is another way I should approach this.

Thanks.

1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/20230109173227.29264-1-jacobabel@xxxxxxxxxx/
2. https://github.com/ProtonMail/proton-bridge/issues/374





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux