Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I'm of the opinion that having sparse-checkout-related functionality > all fall under the 'sparse-checkout' command makes sense. In the > past, all such subcommands happened to require a working tree, but > William has come up with a reasonable one that doesn't. So, I'd be in > favor of this mixing. Yup, I am OK with that reasoning myself. > I'll try to get a chance to review these patches soon, perhaps this weekend. Thanks.
