Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > But you did not find a place the feature you wanted to add with > [2/2] would fit better, perhaps, in which case, somebody else may be > able to suggest an alternative in their reviews of that step, > hopefully. ... oh, or perhaps the list would reach a consensus that mixing a subcommand that does not require a working tree is not all that bad, which I am personally OK with, too. I didn't at all mean to say: "this shouldn't be a subcommand there, do it somewhere else". Thanks.
