On 16/01/2023 13:38, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13 2023, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> The "struct index_state" contains a "repo" member, which should be a >>> pointer to the repository for that index, but which due to us >>> constructing such structs on an ad-hoc basis in various places wasn't >>> always available. >> I'd exclude 6/6 for now, as it seems to depend on some changes only >> in 'next'. Feel free to resend only that step with reduced scope so >> that it applies to 'master', and send in incremental updates when >> each of these topics that are only in 'next' graduates. > Okey, the 6/6 requires ds/omit-trailing-hash-in-index. As both it and > the 1-5/6 of this are in "next" now I think it's best that I just submit > the 6/6 stand-alone after both of those have graduated. > micro-nit: The commit message of 5/6 starts "As we'll see in a subsequent commit..", which may need a slight tweak if 6/6 becomes 'far away' in the commit tree. -- Philip
