Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > The "struct index_state" contains a "repo" member, which should be a > pointer to the repository for that index, but which due to us > constructing such structs on an ad-hoc basis in various places wasn't > always available. I'd exclude 6/6 for now, as it seems to depend on some changes only in 'next'. Feel free to resend only that step with reduced scope so that it applies to 'master', and send in incremental updates when each of these topics that are only in 'next' graduates. Thanks.
