Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I wasn't expecting the initializer idea to work as well as it has. > Now, Patch 5 does all the heavy lifting and Patch 6 is an easy read. > > Outside of one question about the istate->initialized member (which > might not need any change) I'm happy with this version. Thanks, both. And especially for finding 913e0e99 (unpack_trees(): protect the handcrafted in-core index from read_cache(), 2008-08-23). Will queue.
