Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > Are there more regressions that would maybe merit a v2.39.1? How imminent > do you think Git v2.39.1 is? As fewer eyes on the codebase and the list traffic toward the end of the year, I was aiming for January 5th (even though officially I would be on vacation around then til the week after).
