Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Yes it would have been nice, unfortunately it feel through the cracks due to a > combination of unfortunate timing and lack of time. I think the patch was > probably in next by the time I realized the problem and wrote that email. Taylor > was on holiday at the time and then I went away around the time he got back. I > know it was on his todo list but I think he was busy catching up from being away > getting ready for git merge. I had other things I was working on and > unfortunately didn't get round to following it up. Oh sorry, I didn't want to put blame on anyone. Things happen. I just wasn't sure I missed anything. > Overall I'd say it is tempting but risky and inconvenient to any existing users > of "-z" (assuming someone else is actually using it). Quoting the object name is > definitively the safer option at this point. I assume Taylor would be one of the consumers of output of "-z", so thanks for putting him in Cc to get his take on this. -- Toon
