Re: [PATCH 0/7] Bisect dunno

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sun, 14 Oct 2007, Christian Couder wrote:

> Here is my bisect dunno patch series again.
> The changes since last time are the following:
> 
> [PATCH 1/7] rev-list: implement --bisect-all
> [PATCH 2/7] Bisect: fix some white spaces and empty lines breakages.
> 
> -> No change.
> 
> [PATCH 3/7] Bisect: implement "bisect dunno" to mark untestable revisions.
> 
> -> Added dunno stuff in "bisect_replay" that I had forgotten.
> -> Use "bisect_write_good" and "bisect_write_bad" in "bisect_replay" 
> while at it.
> 
> [PATCH 4/7] Bisect: factorise "bisect_write_*" functions.
> [PATCH 5/7] Bisect: factorise some logging into "bisect_write".
> [PATCH 6/7] Bisect: factorise "bisect_{bad,good,dunno}" into "bisect_state".
> 
> -> Some new factorisation and clean up work.
> 
> [PATCH 7/7] Bisect: add "bisect dunno" to the documentation.
> 
> -> Document "bisect dunno" and fix some short usage descriptions.

Thanks for doing this.  I think that especially the factorisation adds 
tremendously to the readibility.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux