Re: SHA-256 transition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2022-06-23 at 00:45:40, Stephen Smith wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 5:29:59 PM MST brian m. carlson wrote:
> > On 2022-06-21 at 10:25:01, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> > > But the reason I'd still say "no" on the technical/UX side is:
> > >  * The inter-op between SHA-256 and SHA-1 repositories is still
> > >  
> > >    nonexistent, except for a one-off import. I.e. we don't have any
> > >    graceful way to migrate an existing repository.
> > 
> > True, but that doesn't meant that new repositories couldn't use SHA-256.
> 
> So, any idea when a graceful way to migrate a repository might show up?

I'm hoping that my employer will give me time to work on this in the
future.  Perhaps I'll have more to show on this closer to the last
quarter of the year.

At the moment I happen to be very busy in my personal life, so I'm not
finding a great deal of time to code much of anything.  But if that
changes, I'll try to get back to it.
-- 
brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them)
Toronto, Ontario, CA

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux