Re: SHA-256 transition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 5:29:59 PM MST brian m. carlson wrote:
> On 2022-06-21 at 10:25:01, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> > But the reason I'd still say "no" on the technical/UX side is:
> >  * The inter-op between SHA-256 and SHA-1 repositories is still
> >  
> >    nonexistent, except for a one-off import. I.e. we don't have any
> >    graceful way to migrate an existing repository.
> 
> True, but that doesn't meant that new repositories couldn't use SHA-256.

So, any idea when a graceful way to migrate a repository might show up?

> 
> >  * For new repositories I think you'll probably want to eventually push
> >  
> >    it to one of the online git hosting providers, none of which (as far
> >    as I'm aware) support SHA-256 repos.
> 
> This, in my view, is the only compelling reason not to use it for new
> repositories.

Which is a reason to send patches by email. 







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux