Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@xxxxxxx> writes:
> Just to chime in, I would tend to approve Julien's proposal, but with
> a reworded commit message, which should convey that the segment to
> translate is not a full sentence.
Thanks. I think that is probably a sensible thing to do. The use
of "%s:" (or "%s") is necessitated by the use of status_printf_ln()
in
status_printf_ln(s, c, "%s", what);
and if we had status_puts() instead, we wouldn't be having this
discussion, as the line would have been
status_puts(s, c, what);
and it is obvious that "what" (aka "label heading") wants to have
colon after it.
