Re: [PATCH 00/10] Factorization of messages with similar meaning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 05.12.21 um 18:25 schrieb Jean-Noël AVILA:
> If needed, "%s and %s are mutually exclusive" could be turned into
> "options %s and %s are mutually exclusive" to make it clear that the
> placeholders can only hold option names.

IMO, being less terse helps not only translators, but also users.

Regarding this particular message, personally, I am not a fan of
"mutually exclusive" (sounds like it's been taken from a law text). How
about "options ... are incompatible" or "... cannot be used together"?

-- Hannes



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux