Re: [StGit PATCH] It doesn't make sense to sink below an unapplied patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Another idea that's been kicked around is to have a general reorder
> command, that spawns an editor and lets you move around (and delete)
> patch names until you're satisfied. (This too would be implemented in
> terms of push and pop of single patches.)

This of course sounds very much like "git rebase -i", but the
semantics would maybe not be identical.

One feature from rebase I'd like to see if this was implemented is the
"squash" option to join two patches.  But it would probably be called
"fold" to keep with stgit terminology.

Another way of doing this editing is to do it interactively,
interacting with the patches directly using a UI, such as an Emacs
editing mode, or a custom text or graphical UI. As you might guess,
I've been thinking a little of an Emacs interface, but nothing has
been written yet.

-- 
David Kågedal

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux