Re: Stg AssertionError in sink command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2007-09-13 16:08:15 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:

> Patch 008 was hidden and I used unhide to bring it back. But the
> hide/unhide process moved it to the top of the stack. I need to sink
> it back down to where it came from. Shouldn't hide/unhide preserve
> the patch position in the stack?

>From what I can see (I've never used the hide/unhide functionality
myself), the current code makes sure that only unapplied patches are
hidden. There is comments like this, though:

  # check needed for backward compatibility with the old
  # hidden patches functionality

So maybe this wasn't always enforced (which would explain how you
could have a hidden applied patch). If so, the backwards compatibility
code is probably broken.

I can't seem to reproduce this using only the latest StGit version
(v0.13-50-gd0c5824).

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@xxxxxxxxxxx
      www.treskal.com/kalle
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux