Re: [StGit PATCH] It doesn't make sense to sink below an unapplied patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/14/07, Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2007-09-13 21:22:19 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> > The patch turns it into an error message instead of an assertion.
>
> As intended.
>
> > Note sure what to do here, I wanted to sink with the patches
> > unapplied since the patch that is being sunk is going to have merge
> > errors when it gets applied. How do a get a chance to fix them?
> >
> > I want to reorder the patches, then apply them one at a time which
> > will allow me to edit in corrections for the ordering change,
>
> The way to do this currently is by telling "stg push" which patch you
> want to push. For example, if you have the unapplied patches
>
>   foo
>   bar
>   baz
>   elvis
>
> and you want to push all of them but foo (thus sinking them below
> foo), say
>
>   $ stg push bar..elvis

Does it make sense to mix pushing and reordering in the push command,
or should reordering always be done with the sink and float commands?

>
> or, equivalently,
>
>   $ stg push bar..
>
> I agree that "stg sink" could be more helpful here by, for example,
> reordering (but not pushing) when told to sink one unapplied patch
> below another. My patch was just a minimal fix to get rid of the
> uncaught exception and exit in an orderly fashion.
>
> --
> Karl Hasselström, kha@xxxxxxxxxxx
>       www.treskal.com/kalle
>


-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux