ulrik <ulrik.sverdrup@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > A duplicate of an already existing section in the documentation of > git-filter-branch was added in commit > f95eef15f2f8a336b9a42749f5458c841a5a5d63. > This patch removes that redundant section. > > Signed-off-by: Ulrik Sverdrup <ulrik.sverdrup@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt | 5 ----- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt > b/Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt > index 29bb8ce..c878ed3 100644 > --- a/Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt > +++ b/Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt > @@ -220,11 +220,6 @@ git filter-branch --commit-filter ' > fi' HEAD > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -Note that the changes introduced by the commits, and not reverted by > -subsequent commits, will still be in the rewritten branch. If you want > -to throw out _changes_ together with the commits, you should use the > -interactive mode of gitlink:git-rebase[1]. > - > The function 'skip_commits' is defined as follows: Hmph, sharp eyes. I suspect that this could have been my screwup. I think we should keep the one at the end of the section as Ulrik does. Dscho? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
