Hi, On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > ulrik <ulrik.sverdrup@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > A duplicate of an already existing section in the documentation of > > git-filter-branch was added in commit > > f95eef15f2f8a336b9a42749f5458c841a5a5d63. > > This patch removes that redundant section. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ulrik Sverdrup <ulrik.sverdrup@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt | 5 ----- > > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt > > b/Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt > > index 29bb8ce..c878ed3 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt > > @@ -220,11 +220,6 @@ git filter-branch --commit-filter ' > > fi' HEAD > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > -Note that the changes introduced by the commits, and not reverted by > > -subsequent commits, will still be in the rewritten branch. If you want > > -to throw out _changes_ together with the commits, you should use the > > -interactive mode of gitlink:git-rebase[1]. > > - > > The function 'skip_commits' is defined as follows: > > Hmph, sharp eyes. I suspect that this could have been my > screwup. Yep, I confirm this was my screwup. Thanks for fixing this, Ulrik! Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
