Hi Junio, On Wed, 6 Oct 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > I don't think that there is a lot of sense in that. The main benefits of > > `scalar` are in the `register` and the `clone` part, and the most natural > > end game would hence be for `git init` and `git clone` to sprout new > > options to support Scalar's features, in a Git-native way. > > Yes, that is even better. An endgame where everybody benefits > natively would be highly desirable. I am glad that this question is now resolved. > Now you are back, do you think we can have the "no more preserve > merges backend" topic graduate to 'master', or do you prefer to cook > it over the cycle (or even two)? I did not see _any_ problems with it, so I'd be in favor of promoting it to `master`. But if you want to play the game more carefully, I would be fine with that, too. Ciao, Dscho
