Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > I don't think that there is a lot of sense in that. The main benefits of > `scalar` are in the `register` and the `clone` part, and the most natural > end game would hence be for `git init` and `git clone` to sprout new > options to support Scalar's features, in a Git-native way. Yes, that is even better. An endgame where everybody benefits natively would be highly desirable. Now you are back, do you think we can have the "no more preserve merges backend" topic graduate to 'master', or do you prefer to cook it over the cycle (or even two)? Thanks.
