Elijah Newren wrote: > I think we should concentrate on making sure that we provide > reasonable behavior when conflicting options/command-lines from the > already provided set are specified. The only way to do that in a way that a) does not significantly alter existing semantics, b) can be clearly documented, and c) can be implemented without a plethora of exceptions, is to create a new configuration orthogonal to all the existing ones: pull.mode=fast-forward -- Felipe Contreras
