Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> This seems to have been stalled but I think it would be a better >> approach to use a custom callback for error reporting, suggested by >> Ævar, which would be where his fsck API clean-up topic would lead >> to. >> >> If it is not ultra-urgent, perhaps you can retract the ones that are >> queued right now, work with Ævar to finish the error-callback work >> and rebuild this topic on top of it? Thanks. > > OK - that works. My original idea was to rewrite it using an > error-callback but using starts_with() instead of the ID that Ævar's > work will provide, but seeing that at least one other contributor (Peff) > seems OK with the patches, rebasing mine on top of his works too. I'll > also take a look at his patches. Thanks, either way would work for me, but if the suggested route forces you review Ævar's code and work together, that would be a good bonus point ;-)
