Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Feb 19 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> This seems to have been stalled but I think it would be a better >> approach to use a custom callback for error reporting, suggested by >> Ævar, which would be where his fsck API clean-up topic would lead >> to. >> >> If it is not ultra-urgent, perhaps you can retract the ones that are >> queued right now, work with Ævar to finish the error-callback work >> and rebuild this topic on top of it? Thanks. > > If my vote counts for something I think it makes sense to have > Jonathan's series go first and just ignore my fsck API improvement > patches (well, the part of my v1[1] which conflicts with his work). > > I'm also happy to help him queue his on top of a v1 version of my > series. Either would work for us, I would think. Thanks.
