Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 11:12:26AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> >> Let's get this reviewed now, but with expectation that it will be >> >> rebased after the dust settles. >> > >> > Makes sense. Pending a review of this would you be interested in queuing >> > a v2 of this that doesn't conflict with in-flight topics? >> >> Not really. I am not sure your recent patches are getting >> sufficient review bandwidth they deserve. > > FWIW, I just read through v2 (without having looked at all at v1 yet!), > and they all seemed like quite reasonable cleanups. I left a few small > comments that might be worth a quick re-roll, but I would also be OK > with the patches being picked up as-is. Yeah, all except for a handful minor nits looked good. Thanks for writing and reviewing. Perhaps a final reroll to tie the loose ends, or is it just a matter of signing off one of them and droping a couple of other ones (which other ones)?
