Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Let's get this reviewed now, but with expectation that it will be >> rebased after the dust settles. > > Makes sense. Pending a review of this would you be interested in queuing > a v2 of this that doesn't conflict with in-flight topics? Not really. I am not sure your recent patches are getting sufficient review bandwidth they deserve. > Patches 01..09 & 13/14 can live conflict-free with what's in "seen" now > (I'd have made the 13th the 10th in v1 if I'd noticed). Then I could > re-roll the remainder of this once the other topics land.
