Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Jonathan Tan pointed out that the fsck error_func doesn't pass you the
> ID of the fsck failure in [1]. This series improves the API so it
> does, and moves the gitmodules_{found,done} variables into the
> fsck_options struct.
>
> The result is that instead of the "print_dangling_gitmodules" member
> in that series we can just implement that with the diff at the end of
> this cover letter (goes on top of a merge of this series & "seen"),
> and without any changes to fsck_finish().
>
> This conflicts with other in-flight fsck changes but the conflict is
> rather trivial. Jeff King has another concurrent series to add a
> couple of new fsck checks, those need to be moved to fsck.h, and
> there's another trivial conflict in 2 hunks due to the
> gitmodules_{found,done} move.
>
> 1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/87blcja2ha.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Let's get this reviewed now, but with expectation that it will be
rebased after the dust settles.
