Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] Cloning with remote unborn HEAD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 09:25:57PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > For what it's worth, here's v7 with advertise/allow/ignore and by
> > default, advertise. I think that some server operators will have use for
> > this feature, and people who want to disable it for whatever reason can
> > still do so. The main disadvantage is complexity - the server knob that
> > server administrators will need to control (but between a simpler
> > allow/ignore knob and a more complicated advertise/allow/ignore knob, I
> > think we might as well go for the slightly more complex one) and
> > complexity in the code (but now that is constrained to one function and
> > a few global variables).
> >
> > As you can see from the range-diff, not much has changed from v6.
> >
> > I've also included Junio's suggestion of tightening the promise made by
> > the server (when the client says "unborn").
> 
> This looks reasonable overall, especially with the feature turned on
> by default, we'd hopefully get reasonable exposure from the get-go.
> 
> Let's mark the topic to be merged to 'next' soonish, unless people
> object.

No objection here. I sent a few comments in response to patch 1; the doc
fix and the leak are probably worth addressing before it hits next. I
couldn't help express my thoughts on the protocol wording, but it may be
best to ignore me. ;)

Thanks for working on this, Jonathan. I think it's a very useful
feature.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux