Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] Cloning with remote unborn HEAD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> For what it's worth, here's v7 with advertise/allow/ignore and by
> default, advertise. I think that some server operators will have use for
> this feature, and people who want to disable it for whatever reason can
> still do so. The main disadvantage is complexity - the server knob that
> server administrators will need to control (but between a simpler
> allow/ignore knob and a more complicated advertise/allow/ignore knob, I
> think we might as well go for the slightly more complex one) and
> complexity in the code (but now that is constrained to one function and
> a few global variables).
>
> As you can see from the range-diff, not much has changed from v6.
>
> I've also included Junio's suggestion of tightening the promise made by
> the server (when the client says "unborn").

This looks reasonable overall, especially with the feature turned on
by default, we'd hopefully get reasonable exposure from the get-go.

Let's mark the topic to be merged to 'next' soonish, unless people
object.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux