Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Maintenance IV: Platform-specific background maintenance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/9/2020 8:04 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 7:33 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>> Update in V6
>>>> ============
>>>>
>>>>  * The Windows platform uses the tempfile API a bit better, including using
>>>>    the frequency in the filename to make the test simpler.
>>>
>>> Are two fix-up patches from Eric that have been queued near the top
>>> of ds/maintenance-part-4 still relevant?
>>
>> Both of the patches from Sunshine are still relevant atop Stolee's
>> latest (v6), and they should apply cleanly (I would think) since v6
>> didn't change anything related to those patches.
> 
> Yup, I tried rebasing these two and they applied cleanly, so I'll
> include them in today's pushout (which I haven't finished yet).
> 
> I probably would not notice if the updated 4-patch series already
> solved the issue in another way without causing the textual conflict
> with your two fix-up patches, though ;-)

I noticed a subtle issue with the v6 series, so I _will_ reroll the
series squashing in Eric's patches. He will remain a co-author and
I'll add the Helped-by: Ævar along with the details for that patch.

Thanks,
-Stolee




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux