Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Maintenance IV: Platform-specific background maintenance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 7:33 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > Update in V6
>> > ============
>> >
>> >  * The Windows platform uses the tempfile API a bit better, including using
>> >    the frequency in the filename to make the test simpler.
>>
>> Are two fix-up patches from Eric that have been queued near the top
>> of ds/maintenance-part-4 still relevant?
>
> Both of the patches from Sunshine are still relevant atop Stolee's
> latest (v6), and they should apply cleanly (I would think) since v6
> didn't change anything related to those patches.

Yup, I tried rebasing these two and they applied cleanly, so I'll
include them in today's pushout (which I haven't finished yet).

I probably would not notice if the updated 4-patch series already
solved the issue in another way without causing the textual conflict
with your two fix-up patches, though ;-)

Thanks.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux