Junio C Hamano wrote: > Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> But if you are arguing that when you write "Signed-off-by:" your > >> sign-off can mean something other than what DCO says it means, > > > > The DCO has clause (d), which clearly states the developer must agree > > that a record of his/her contribution is maintained indefinitely (and > > that includes his/her sign off). > > Yes. Are you saying that you are OK with (a)-(c) but not (d)? I'm saying if the author of the patch states "I don't agree with a record of my contribution being maintained indefinitely with my sign off", then clause (d) isn't met. -- Felipe Contreras
