Re: Nobody is THE one making contribution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> But if you are arguing that when you write "Signed-off-by:" your
>> sign-off can mean something other than what DCO says it means,
>
> The DCO has clause (d), which clearly states the developer must agree
> that a record of his/her contribution is maintained indefinitely (and
> that includes his/her sign off).

Yes.  Are you saying that you are OK with (a)-(c) but not (d)?

> So there's at least two meanings in the DCO itself.

I am not sure what you mean.  DCO itself has a to d (four) clauses,
so that is not where your two comes from (unless you are hedging by
saying "at least two").  What are you counting to reach two?

Still puzzled.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux