Randall S. Becker wrote: > On December 24, 2020 12:19 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > We can narrow down the part I'm talking about: > > > > d. I *agree* that a record of the contribution is maintained > > indefinitely. > > > > I don't agree with that. > > Clause d is important to maintain compatibility with GRPD[1] rules > about maintaining identifying information. This clause is more than > about the contribution. It is about consent to maintain your name and > email on record indefinitely, as part of the contribution, in the git > repository, without the ability to rescind the permission at some > point in the future. I didn't mean I don't agree that clause (d) should be there. I mean if in a particular contribution I don't agree that a record of the contribution is maintained indefinitely with my name, then clause (d) is not met. And it is not actually my true contribution, but a bastardization of it made by somebody else. You shouldn't assign to my name changes I don't agree with in perpetuity. -- Felipe Contreras