Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> >> Yup, I already mentioned UI mistake so you do not have to repeat
> >
> > You said it was a UI mistake, not me. I am a different mind than yours.
>
> Yes, but the point is that I do not need to nor particularly want to
> hear your opinion on the behaviour of "git merge-file".
Then disregard the comment.
> I know (and others reading the thread on the list also know) that the
> exit code of the command is misdesigned already.
Unless you can read minds, you don't know that.
And even if you do, I don't know what you know. I can't read your mind.
Plus, they can disregard the comment as well.
> > I communicated that fact after you, so I did not repeat anything,
> > because I hadn't said that before. *You* did, not *me*.
>
> Again, please realize that on list discussion is a team effort to
> come up together a better design of a shared solution.
Which is why agreement in a team with different minds and different
viewpoints is important.
Just to show a few instances of Jeff King telling you he agrees with
you:
1. "I agree it's not all that useful in that example" [1]. 16 Dec 2020
2. "I agree with the current definition" [2]. 18 Dec 2020 (same thread)
3. "I agree the two should behave the same" [3]. 18 Dec 2020 (same
mail)
The fact that you value Jeff King's agreement and don't care what some
other members in the community think, is a personal vale judgement, and
doesn't necessarily mean the viewpoints of such community members are
objectively worthless.
Cheers.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/X9pUc2HXUr3+WHbR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/X9xJ6BHM9VY0%2FyLs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/git/X9xJ6BHM9VY0%2FyLs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
--
Felipe Contreras
