On 2020-12-02 at 16:07:55, Todd Zullinger wrote: > brian m. carlson wrote: > > If we want this to be effective, then yes, people will need to upgrade. > > But if they're happy with the old behavior on ancient systems, that > > shouldn't be a problem. > > Indeed. Is it worth mentioning this at all in INSTALL? > Something like: > > - The minimum supported version of docbook-xsl is 1.74. > + The minimum supported version of docbook-xsl is 1.74. For consistent > + IDs in the HTML version of the user-manual, 1.79.1 or newer is > + necessary. > > perhaps? I don't know that that's even necessary. Anyone doing reproducible builds is already aware of the required versions in order to do a reproducible build, and I don't think the average user is going to be super interested. We can if you feel strongly about it, but I don't personally see it as a big deal. -- brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them) Houston, Texas, US
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
