On 2020.11.03 13:22, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Josh Steadmon <steadmon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> So the value being passed between client and server over the > >> protocol may look like `<sid1>/<sid2>/<sid3>` rather than just a > >> single `<sid_x>` term. For your purposes, do you want or care if > >> you get the single term or the full SID ? > > > > I'm not sure we care too much one way or the other. A single component > > of the SID should be enough to join client & server logs, but it's > > easier to just send the whole thing. > > It may be worth documenting this design decision in the protocol > doc; even though protocol doc may say this should be treated as an > opaque token, people may assume certain structure. Done in V3.
