Josh Steadmon <steadmon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> So the value being passed between client and server over the >> protocol may look like `<sid1>/<sid2>/<sid3>` rather than just a >> single `<sid_x>` term. For your purposes, do you want or care if >> you get the single term or the full SID ? > > I'm not sure we care too much one way or the other. A single component > of the SID should be enough to join client & server logs, but it's > easier to just send the whole thing. It may be worth documenting this design decision in the protocol doc; even though protocol doc may say this should be treated as an opaque token, people may assume certain structure.
